64.9 F
Rye
Thursday, September 29, 2022
Home Government At Rye City Council Debates, Everything on the Table

At Rye City Council Debates, Everything on the Table

IMG_2780 audience

At Monday night's Rye City Council candidate debate held at The Osborn, all six candidates seems in violet agreement that as it relates to the city budget "everything is on the table". The evening was fairly subdued except during closing statements when sitting Councilman Joe Sack took a swipe at candidate Josh Nathan saying taxes went up during his watch on the school board. Nathan defended his record, saying in fact Rye had the lowest tax rate increase in Westchester County during his school board tenure.

The evening was produced by the Civics Committee at The Osborn, who produced a series of thoughtful questions that were pit to the candidates. Rye TV taped the event, so if you missed it be sure and try to catch a replay.

In the opening statements, here are a few points the candidates made about themselves:

IMG_2782 dems

Josh Nathan (D)

  • Spoke about meeting pressing needs
  • Flood mitigation as the #1 infrastructure need
  • Open, transparent government

Paula Gamache (D)

  • Deputy Mayor
  • 20 years in Rye
  • "We have kept the city steady all these years"

Catherine Parker (D)

  • Came to Rye in 1996, operates Parker's (travel store)
  • "In the last two years you have seen some improvements in pedestrian safety downtown."

IMG_2785 gop

Laura Brett (R)

  • a "Rye advocate" and attorney
  • President of the Board of the Rte Historical Society
  • We are "very fortunate to have six experienced candidates running for council."

 Joe Sack (R)

  • "One of the most important audiences in Rye" (speaking about the audience at The Osborn)
  • "A very strong record when it comes to fiscal responsibility"

Rafael Elias-Linero (R)

  • "16 years of experience in the banking industry and 10 years as a civil engineer."

Some of the Questions and Highlighted Answers:

Question about reducing costs such as garbage collection:

  • Joe Sack said it's not just about doing more with less, but now is about"doing less with less" and highlighted when he encouraged the city to sell its old street signs.
  • Rafael Elias-Linero spoke about reducing contractual costs (17% of budget) and material costs (13% of budget).
  • Laura Brett spoke about partnerships with non-profits
  • Paula Gamache spoke about shared services with safety and recreation
  • Catherine Parker said our garbage trucks are too small to collect trash only once per week.
  • Josh Nathan warned "if you keep cutting you cut into the bone" and spoke about his Board of Education expertise with collective bargaining.

Question about Rye Town Park and Rye City's relative lack of influence over its governance.

  • Catherine Parker said signs in Rye Town Park prohibit ball playing, picnicking and… "it goes on and says 'no fun'".
  • Many spoke about an opportunity to gain more control if the Town of Rye is dissolved.
  • Joe Sack said theRye Town Park Advisory Committee – a citizens group – is "a success story"

Qustion about flooding:

  • Joe Sack said "there have to be solutions big and small".
  • Catherine Parker said "if you have one arguement for county government, its flood control".

Quesion about Playland

  • Joe Sack reminded the audience Rye bears a small percentage of Playland's cost but "we bear 100% of quality of life impacts". He said he favors the Sustainable Playland plan proposal – "that's the one we should try to push for from the Rye perspective."

Question about shared services:

  • Rafael Elias-Linero suggested we consolidate coastal protection / marine police.
  • Catherine Parker suggested the city rent 1037 Boston Post Road to the Rye City School District
  • Josh Nathan said he had a lot of experience on the issue with his time on the school board and mentioned plowing, purchasing and use of buildings as possble shared service areas.
  1. Catherine, I’m pretty sure you’ve got my vote, but rent the old CVS building to the School District? The District is paying less than $200k/year to rent their current location. Is that really enough to provide sufficient compensation for the debt on the lot? And wouldn’t the City be better off with the lot in private, tax paying, hands?

  2. Josh – yes, you and the board did a good job with community support in the last round of RTA negotiations, but the City faces an entirely different situation w/r/t the Taylor law and binding arbitration. The Schools can legally wait as long as they want to settle a contract. The City doesn’t have that luxury. And a wait-it-out approach could easily lead to an arbitrator setting a contract that’s much worse than inflation. How would your negotiation experience help in that scenario?

  3. Mr. Rafael Elias-Linero – at the League’s debate, you suggested turning the old CVS lot into a parking lot. How much revenue would paid parking from a location so far from the train station and shopping really generate? If you paved over the space, what would that do for flooding?

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here